HDFS-9329. TestBootstrapStandby#testRateThrottling is flaky because fsimage size is smaller than IO buffer size. Contributed by Zhe Zhang.
Change-Id: I09896c46e9ee0718b67c64fac5acfb3f7decf0b9
This commit is contained in:
parent
04d97f8abb
commit
259bea3b48
@ -2204,6 +2204,9 @@ Release 2.8.0 - UNRELEASED
|
||||
HDFS-9343. Empty caller context considered invalid. (Mingliang Liu via
|
||||
Arpit Agarwal)
|
||||
|
||||
HDFS-9329. TestBootstrapStandby#testRateThrottling is flaky because fsimage
|
||||
size is smaller than IO buffer size. (zhz)
|
||||
|
||||
Release 2.7.2 - UNRELEASED
|
||||
|
||||
INCOMPATIBLE CHANGES
|
||||
|
@ -25,13 +25,16 @@
|
||||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.net.URI;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
|
||||
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
|
||||
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileUtil;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSConfigKeys;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSUtilClient;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSNNTopology;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.CheckpointSignature;
|
||||
@ -109,12 +112,16 @@ public void testSuccessfulBaseCase() throws Exception {
|
||||
"storage directory does not exist or is not accessible", ioe);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int expectedCheckpointTxId = (int)NameNodeAdapter.getNamesystem(nn0)
|
||||
.getFSImage().getMostRecentCheckpointTxId();
|
||||
|
||||
int rc = BootstrapStandby.run(new String[] { "-nonInteractive" },
|
||||
cluster.getConfiguration(index));
|
||||
assertEquals(0, rc);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should have copied over the namespace from the active
|
||||
FSImageTestUtil.assertNNHasCheckpoints(cluster, index, ImmutableList.of(0));
|
||||
FSImageTestUtil.assertNNHasCheckpoints(cluster, index,
|
||||
ImmutableList.of(expectedCheckpointTxId));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We should now be able to start the standbys successfully.
|
||||
@ -221,7 +228,7 @@ public void testOtherNodeNotActive() throws Exception {
|
||||
* {@link DFSConfigKeys#DFS_IMAGE_TRANSFER_BOOTSTRAP_STANDBY_RATE_KEY}
|
||||
* created by HDFS-8808.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
@Test(timeout=30000)
|
||||
public void testRateThrottling() throws Exception {
|
||||
cluster.getConfiguration(0).setLong(
|
||||
DFSConfigKeys.DFS_IMAGE_TRANSFER_RATE_KEY, 1);
|
||||
@ -229,23 +236,46 @@ public void testRateThrottling() throws Exception {
|
||||
cluster.waitActive();
|
||||
nn0 = cluster.getNameNode(0);
|
||||
cluster.transitionToActive(0);
|
||||
// Each edit has at least 1 byte. So the lowRate definitely should cause
|
||||
// a timeout, if enforced. If lowRate is not enforced, any reasonable test
|
||||
// machine should at least download an image with 5 edits in 5 seconds.
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
// Any reasonable test machine should be able to transfer 1 byte per MS
|
||||
// (which is ~1K/s)
|
||||
final int minXferRatePerMS = 1;
|
||||
int imageXferBufferSize = DFSUtilClient.getIoFileBufferSize(
|
||||
new Configuration());
|
||||
File imageFile = null;
|
||||
int dirIdx = 0;
|
||||
while (imageFile == null || imageFile.length() < imageXferBufferSize) {
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||||
cluster.getFileSystem(0).mkdirs(new Path("/foo" + dirIdx++));
|
||||
}
|
||||
nn0.getRpcServer().rollEditLog();
|
||||
NameNodeAdapter.enterSafeMode(nn0, false);
|
||||
NameNodeAdapter.saveNamespace(nn0);
|
||||
NameNodeAdapter.leaveSafeMode(nn0);
|
||||
imageFile = FSImageTestUtil.findLatestImageFile(FSImageTestUtil
|
||||
.getFSImage(nn0).getStorage().getStorageDir(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
final int timeOut = (int)(imageFile.length() / minXferRatePerMS) + 1;
|
||||
// A very low DFS_IMAGE_TRANSFER_RATE_KEY value won't affect bootstrapping
|
||||
final AtomicBoolean bootStrapped = new AtomicBoolean(false);
|
||||
new Thread(
|
||||
new Runnable() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
testSuccessfulBaseCase();
|
||||
bootStrapped.set(true);
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
fail(e.getMessage());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
).start();
|
||||
GenericTestUtils.waitFor(new Supplier<Boolean>() {
|
||||
public Boolean get() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
testSuccessfulBaseCase();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return bootStrapped.get();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, 500, 5000);
|
||||
}, 50, timeOut);
|
||||
|
||||
shutdownCluster();
|
||||
setupCluster();
|
||||
@ -257,17 +287,26 @@ public Boolean get() {
|
||||
cluster.transitionToActive(0);
|
||||
// A very low DFS_IMAGE_TRANSFER_BOOTSTRAP_STANDBY_RATE_KEY value should
|
||||
// cause timeout
|
||||
bootStrapped.set(false);
|
||||
new Thread(
|
||||
new Runnable() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
testSuccessfulBaseCase();
|
||||
bootStrapped.set(true);
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
LOG.info(e.getMessage());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
).start();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
GenericTestUtils.waitFor(new Supplier<Boolean>() {
|
||||
public Boolean get() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
testSuccessfulBaseCase();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return bootStrapped.get();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}, 500, 5000);
|
||||
}, 50, timeOut);
|
||||
fail("Did not timeout");
|
||||
} catch (TimeoutException e) {
|
||||
LOG.info("Encountered expected timeout.");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user