HDFS-10987. Make Decommission less expensive when lot of blocks present. Contributed by Brahma Reddy Battula.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fdce515091
commit
332a61fd74
@ -388,6 +388,10 @@ private class Monitor implements Runnable {
|
|||||||
* The number of blocks that have been checked on this tick.
|
* The number of blocks that have been checked on this tick.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
private int numBlocksChecked = 0;
|
private int numBlocksChecked = 0;
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* The number of blocks checked after (re)holding lock.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
private int numBlocksCheckedPerLock = 0;
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* The number of nodes that have been checked on this tick. Used for
|
* The number of nodes that have been checked on this tick. Used for
|
||||||
* statistics.
|
* statistics.
|
||||||
@ -418,6 +422,7 @@ public void run() {
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
// Reset the checked count at beginning of each iteration
|
// Reset the checked count at beginning of each iteration
|
||||||
numBlocksChecked = 0;
|
numBlocksChecked = 0;
|
||||||
|
numBlocksCheckedPerLock = 0;
|
||||||
numNodesChecked = 0;
|
numNodesChecked = 0;
|
||||||
// Check decom progress
|
// Check decom progress
|
||||||
namesystem.writeLock();
|
namesystem.writeLock();
|
||||||
@ -451,7 +456,8 @@ private void check() {
|
|||||||
iterkey).iterator();
|
iterkey).iterator();
|
||||||
final LinkedList<DatanodeDescriptor> toRemove = new LinkedList<>();
|
final LinkedList<DatanodeDescriptor> toRemove = new LinkedList<>();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
while (it.hasNext() && !exceededNumBlocksPerCheck()) {
|
while (it.hasNext() && !exceededNumBlocksPerCheck() && namesystem
|
||||||
|
.isRunning()) {
|
||||||
numNodesChecked++;
|
numNodesChecked++;
|
||||||
final Map.Entry<DatanodeDescriptor, AbstractList<BlockInfo>>
|
final Map.Entry<DatanodeDescriptor, AbstractList<BlockInfo>>
|
||||||
entry = it.next();
|
entry = it.next();
|
||||||
@ -577,7 +583,28 @@ private void processBlocksForDecomInternal(
|
|||||||
int decommissionOnlyReplicas = 0;
|
int decommissionOnlyReplicas = 0;
|
||||||
int lowRedundancyInOpenFiles = 0;
|
int lowRedundancyInOpenFiles = 0;
|
||||||
while (it.hasNext()) {
|
while (it.hasNext()) {
|
||||||
|
if (insufficientList == null
|
||||||
|
&& numBlocksCheckedPerLock >= numBlocksPerCheck) {
|
||||||
|
// During fullscan insufficientlyReplicated will NOT be null, iterator
|
||||||
|
// will be DN's iterator. So should not yield lock, otherwise
|
||||||
|
// ConcurrentModificationException could occur.
|
||||||
|
// Once the fullscan done, iterator will be a copy. So can yield the
|
||||||
|
// lock.
|
||||||
|
// Yielding is required in case of block number is greater than the
|
||||||
|
// configured per-iteration-limit.
|
||||||
|
namesystem.writeUnlock();
|
||||||
|
try {
|
||||||
|
LOG.debug("Yielded lock during decommission check");
|
||||||
|
Thread.sleep(0, 500);
|
||||||
|
} catch (InterruptedException ignored) {
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
// reset
|
||||||
|
numBlocksCheckedPerLock = 0;
|
||||||
|
namesystem.writeLock();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
numBlocksChecked++;
|
numBlocksChecked++;
|
||||||
|
numBlocksCheckedPerLock++;
|
||||||
final BlockInfo block = it.next();
|
final BlockInfo block = it.next();
|
||||||
// Remove the block from the list if it's no longer in the block map,
|
// Remove the block from the list if it's no longer in the block map,
|
||||||
// e.g. the containing file has been deleted
|
// e.g. the containing file has been deleted
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user