YARN-6769. Make schedulables without demand less needy in FairSharePolicy#compare. (Yunfan Zhou via Yufei Gu)
This commit is contained in:
parent
228ddaa31d
commit
4a574e9a84
@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ public String getName() {
|
||||
* Compare Schedulables via weighted fair sharing. In addition, Schedulables
|
||||
* below their min share get priority over those whose min share is met.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Schedulables without resource demand get lower priority than
|
||||
* ones who have demands.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Schedulables below their min share are compared by how far below it they
|
||||
* are as a ratio. For example, if job A has 8 out of a min share of 10 tasks
|
||||
* and job B has 50 out of a min share of 100, then job B is scheduled next,
|
||||
@ -79,6 +82,16 @@ private static class FairShareComparator implements Comparator<Schedulable>,
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public int compare(Schedulable s1, Schedulable s2) {
|
||||
Resource demand1 = s1.getDemand();
|
||||
Resource demand2 = s2.getDemand();
|
||||
if (demand1.equals(Resources.none()) && Resources.greaterThan(
|
||||
RESOURCE_CALCULATOR, null, demand2, Resources.none())) {
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else if (demand2.equals(Resources.none()) && Resources.greaterThan(
|
||||
RESOURCE_CALCULATOR, null, demand1, Resources.none())) {
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
double minShareRatio1, minShareRatio2;
|
||||
double useToWeightRatio1, useToWeightRatio2;
|
||||
double weight1, weight2;
|
||||
@ -86,9 +99,9 @@ public int compare(Schedulable s1, Schedulable s2) {
|
||||
Resource resourceUsage1 = s1.getResourceUsage();
|
||||
Resource resourceUsage2 = s2.getResourceUsage();
|
||||
Resource minShare1 = Resources.min(RESOURCE_CALCULATOR, null,
|
||||
s1.getMinShare(), s1.getDemand());
|
||||
s1.getMinShare(), demand1);
|
||||
Resource minShare2 = Resources.min(RESOURCE_CALCULATOR, null,
|
||||
s2.getMinShare(), s2.getDemand());
|
||||
s2.getMinShare(), demand2);
|
||||
boolean s1Needy = Resources.lessThan(RESOURCE_CALCULATOR, null,
|
||||
resourceUsage1, minShare1);
|
||||
boolean s2Needy = Resources.lessThan(RESOURCE_CALCULATOR, null,
|
||||
|
@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ private class FairShareComparatorTester {
|
||||
private Resource minShare = Resource.newInstance(0, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
private Resource demand = Resource.newInstance(4, 1);
|
||||
private Resource[] demandCollection = {
|
||||
Resource.newInstance(0, 0), Resource.newInstance(4, 1) };
|
||||
|
||||
private String[] nameCollection = {"A", "B", "C"};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -160,21 +162,24 @@ private void generateAndTest(Stack<Schedulable> genSchedulable) {
|
||||
for (int j = 0; j < startTimeColloection.length; j++) {
|
||||
for (int k = 0; k < usageCollection.length; k++) {
|
||||
for (int t = 0; t < weightsCollection.length; t++) {
|
||||
genSchedulable.push(createSchedulable(i, j, k, t));
|
||||
for (int m = 0; m < demandCollection.length; m++) {
|
||||
genSchedulable.push(createSchedulable(m, i, j, k, t));
|
||||
generateAndTest(genSchedulable);
|
||||
genSchedulable.pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private Schedulable createSchedulable(
|
||||
int nameIdx, int startTimeIdx, int usageIdx, int weightsIdx) {
|
||||
return new MockSchedulable(minShare, demand, nameCollection[nameIdx],
|
||||
startTimeColloection[startTimeIdx], usageCollection[usageIdx],
|
||||
weightsCollection[weightsIdx]);
|
||||
int demandId, int nameIdx, int startTimeIdx,
|
||||
int usageIdx, int weightsIdx) {
|
||||
return new MockSchedulable(minShare, demandCollection[demandId],
|
||||
nameCollection[nameIdx], startTimeColloection[startTimeIdx],
|
||||
usageCollection[usageIdx], weightsCollection[weightsIdx]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private boolean checkTransitivity(
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user