HDFS-17220. Fix same available space policy in AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy (#6174)

Reviewed-by: He Xiaoqiao <hexiaoqiao@apache.org>
Reviewed-by: zhangshuyan <zqingchai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Li <tomscut@apache.org>
This commit is contained in:
GuoPhilipse 2023-10-18 13:01:32 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 13843f4a88
commit 615a2a42cf
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 65 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ public boolean areAllVolumesWithinFreeSpaceThreshold() {
leastAvailable = Math.min(leastAvailable, volume.getAvailable());
mostAvailable = Math.max(mostAvailable, volume.getAvailable());
}
return (mostAvailable - leastAvailable) < balancedSpaceThreshold;
return (mostAvailable - leastAvailable) <= balancedSpaceThreshold;
}
/**

View File

@ -35,16 +35,18 @@
public class TestAvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy {
private static final int RANDOMIZED_ITERATIONS = 10000;
private static final int BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD = 1024 * 1024; // 1MB
private static final float RANDOMIZED_ERROR_PERCENT = 0.05f;
private static final long RANDOMIZED_ALLOWED_ERROR = (long) (RANDOMIZED_ERROR_PERCENT * RANDOMIZED_ITERATIONS);
private static void initPolicy(VolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi> policy,
long balanceSpaceThreshold,
float preferencePercent) {
Configuration conf = new Configuration();
// Set the threshold to consider volumes imbalanced to 1MB
conf.setLong(
DFS_DATANODE_AVAILABLE_SPACE_VOLUME_CHOOSING_POLICY_BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD_KEY,
1024 * 1024); // 1MB
balanceSpaceThreshold);
conf.setFloat(
DFS_DATANODE_AVAILABLE_SPACE_VOLUME_CHOOSING_POLICY_BALANCED_SPACE_PREFERENCE_FRACTION_KEY,
preferencePercent);
@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ public void testRR() throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
final AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi> policy =
ReflectionUtils.newInstance(AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy.class, null);
initPolicy(policy, 1.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 1.0f);
TestRoundRobinVolumeChoosingPolicy.testRR(policy);
}
@ -68,7 +70,7 @@ public void testRR() throws Exception {
public void testRRPolicyExceptionMessage() throws Exception {
final AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi> policy
= new AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi>();
initPolicy(policy, 1.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 1.0f);
TestRoundRobinVolumeChoosingPolicy.testRRPolicyExceptionMessage(policy);
}
@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ public void testTwoUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
final AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi> policy =
ReflectionUtils.newInstance(AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy.class, null);
initPolicy(policy, 1.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 1.0f);
List<FsVolumeSpi> volumes = new ArrayList<FsVolumeSpi>();
@ -120,7 +122,7 @@ public void testThreeUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
// We should alternate assigning between the two volumes with a lot of free
// space.
initPolicy(policy, 1.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 1.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(1), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(2), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
@ -131,7 +133,7 @@ public void testThreeUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
null));
// All writes should be assigned to the volume with the least free space.
initPolicy(policy, 0.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 0.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(0), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(0), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
@ -141,7 +143,57 @@ public void testThreeUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(0), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
}
@Test(timeout=60000)
public void testSameAvailableVolumeSpace() throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
final AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi> policy =
ReflectionUtils.newInstance(AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy.class, null);
List<FsVolumeSpi> volumes = new ArrayList<FsVolumeSpi>();
// first volume with 1MB free space
volumes.add(Mockito.mock(FsVolumeSpi.class));
Mockito.when(volumes.get(0).getAvailable()).thenReturn(1024L * 1024L);
// Second volume with 1MB free space
volumes.add(Mockito.mock(FsVolumeSpi.class));
Mockito.when(volumes.get(1).getAvailable()).thenReturn(1024L * 1024L);
// Third volume with 1MB free space
volumes.add(Mockito.mock(FsVolumeSpi.class));
Mockito.when(volumes.get(2).getAvailable()).thenReturn(1024L * 1024L);
// Fourth volume with 1MB free space
volumes.add(Mockito.mock(FsVolumeSpi.class));
Mockito.when(volumes.get(3).getAvailable()).thenReturn(1024L * 1024L);
// We should alternate assigning between all the above volumes
// for they have the same available space
initPolicy(policy, 0, 1.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(0), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(1), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(2), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(3), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
// We should alternate assigning between all the above volumes
// for they have the same available space
initPolicy(policy, 0, 0.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(0), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(1), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(2), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(3), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
}
@Test(timeout=60000)
public void testFourUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
@ -169,7 +221,7 @@ public void testFourUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
// We should alternate assigning between the two volumes with a lot of free
// space.
initPolicy(policy, 1.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 1.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(2), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(3), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
@ -181,7 +233,7 @@ public void testFourUnbalancedVolumes() throws Exception {
// We should alternate assigning between the two volumes with less free
// space.
initPolicy(policy, 0.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 0.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(0), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
null));
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(1), policy.chooseVolume(volumes, 100,
@ -213,7 +265,7 @@ public void testNotEnoughSpaceOnSelectedVolume() throws Exception {
// However, if the volume with the least free space doesn't have enough
// space to accept the replica size, and another volume does have enough
// free space, that should be chosen instead.
initPolicy(policy, 0.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 0.0f);
Assert.assertEquals(volumes.get(1), policy.chooseVolume(volumes,
1024L * 1024L * 2, null));
}
@ -223,7 +275,7 @@ public void testAvailableSpaceChanges() throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
final AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy<FsVolumeSpi> policy =
ReflectionUtils.newInstance(AvailableSpaceVolumeChoosingPolicy.class, null);
initPolicy(policy, 1.0f);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, 1.0f);
List<FsVolumeSpi> volumes = new ArrayList<FsVolumeSpi>();
@ -292,7 +344,7 @@ public void doRandomizedTest(float preferencePercent, int lowSpaceVolumes,
volumes.add(volume);
}
initPolicy(policy, preferencePercent);
initPolicy(policy, BALANCED_SPACE_THRESHOLD, preferencePercent);
long lowAvailableSpaceVolumeSelected = 0;
long highAvailableSpaceVolumeSelected = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < RANDOMIZED_ITERATIONS; i++) {