YARN-7638. Unit tests related to preemption for auto created leaf queues feature.Contributed by Suma Shivaprasad.
This commit is contained in:
Sunil G
parent
ee028bfdf1
commit
890d3d0645
@ -296,6 +296,10 @@ protected void setupQueueConfigs(Resource clusterResource,
|
||||
+ queueCapacities.getAbsoluteMaximumCapacity()
|
||||
+ " [= 1.0 maximumCapacity undefined, "
|
||||
+ "(parentAbsoluteMaxCapacity * maximumCapacity) / 100 otherwise ]"
|
||||
+ "\n" + "effectiveMinResource=" +
|
||||
getEffectiveCapacity(CommonNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL) + "\n"
|
||||
+ " , effectiveMaxResource=" +
|
||||
getEffectiveMaxCapacity(CommonNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL)
|
||||
+ "\n" + "userLimit = " + usersManager.getUserLimit()
|
||||
+ " [= configuredUserLimit ]" + "\n" + "userLimitFactor = "
|
||||
+ usersManager.getUserLimitFactor()
|
||||
@ -502,7 +506,11 @@ public String toString() {
|
||||
+ ", " + "usedResources=" + queueUsage.getUsed() + ", "
|
||||
+ "usedCapacity=" + getUsedCapacity() + ", " + "absoluteUsedCapacity="
|
||||
+ getAbsoluteUsedCapacity() + ", " + "numApps=" + getNumApplications()
|
||||
+ ", " + "numContainers=" + getNumContainers();
|
||||
+ ", " + "numContainers=" + getNumContainers() + ", "
|
||||
+ "effectiveMinResource=" +
|
||||
getEffectiveCapacity(CommonNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL) +
|
||||
" , effectiveMaxResource=" +
|
||||
getEffectiveMaxCapacity(CommonNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
readLock.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ public static CapacitySchedulerConfiguration setupQueueMappings(
|
||||
queuePlacementRules.add(YarnConfiguration.USER_GROUP_PLACEMENT_RULE);
|
||||
conf.setQueuePlacementRules(queuePlacementRules);
|
||||
|
||||
List<UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.QueueMapping> existingMappings = conf
|
||||
.getQueueMappings();
|
||||
List<UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.QueueMapping> existingMappings =
|
||||
conf.getQueueMappings();
|
||||
|
||||
//set queue mapping
|
||||
List<UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.QueueMapping> queueMappings =
|
||||
@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ public static CapacitySchedulerConfiguration setupQueueMappings(
|
||||
UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.QueueMapping userQueueMapping =
|
||||
new UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.QueueMapping(
|
||||
UserGroupMappingPlacementRule.QueueMapping.MappingType.USER,
|
||||
USER + userIds[i], getQueueMapping(parentQueue, USER +
|
||||
userIds[i]));
|
||||
USER + userIds[i],
|
||||
getQueueMapping(parentQueue, USER + userIds[i]));
|
||||
queueMappings.add(userQueueMapping);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -439,34 +439,6 @@ protected RMNodeLabelsManager createNodeLabelManager() {
|
||||
return newMockRM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void checkQueueCapacities(CapacityScheduler newCS, float capacityC,
|
||||
float capacityD) {
|
||||
CSQueue rootQueue = newCS.getRootQueue();
|
||||
CSQueue queueC = tcs.findQueue(rootQueue, C);
|
||||
CSQueue queueD = tcs.findQueue(rootQueue, D);
|
||||
CSQueue queueC1 = tcs.findQueue(queueC, C1);
|
||||
CSQueue queueC2 = tcs.findQueue(queueC, C2);
|
||||
CSQueue queueC3 = tcs.findQueue(queueC, C3);
|
||||
|
||||
float capC = capacityC / 100.0f;
|
||||
float capD = capacityD / 100.0f;
|
||||
|
||||
tcs.checkQueueCapacity(queueC, capC, capC, 1.0f, 1.0f);
|
||||
tcs.checkQueueCapacity(queueD, capD, capD, 1.0f, 1.0f);
|
||||
tcs.checkQueueCapacity(queueC1, C1_CAPACITY / 100.0f,
|
||||
(C1_CAPACITY / 100.0f) * capC, 1.0f, 1.0f);
|
||||
tcs.checkQueueCapacity(queueC2, C2_CAPACITY / 100.0f,
|
||||
(C2_CAPACITY / 100.0f) * capC, 1.0f, 1.0f);
|
||||
|
||||
if (queueC3 != null) {
|
||||
ManagedParentQueue parentQueue = (ManagedParentQueue) queueC;
|
||||
QueueCapacities cap =
|
||||
parentQueue.getLeafQueueTemplate().getQueueCapacities();
|
||||
tcs.checkQueueCapacity(queueC3, cap.getCapacity(),
|
||||
(cap.getCapacity()) * capC, 1.0f, 1.0f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static String getQueueMapping(String parentQueue, String leafQueue) {
|
||||
return parentQueue + DOT + leafQueue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
|
||||
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
|
||||
* distributed with this work for additional information
|
||||
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
|
||||
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
|
||||
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
|
||||
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
||||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
||||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
||||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
||||
* limitations under the License.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
package org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.capacity;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.junit.Before;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.C;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.D;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.E;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.USER0;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.USER1;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.USER2;
|
||||
import static org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler
|
||||
.capacity.TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.USER3;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Tests various preemption cases on auto-created leaf queues. All
|
||||
* auto-created leaf queues will end up having same priority since they are set
|
||||
* from template. Priority on ManagedParent Queues can be set however and
|
||||
* priority based premption cases are based on that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public class TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueuePreemption
|
||||
extends TestCapacitySchedulerSurgicalPreemption {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
@Before
|
||||
public void setUp() throws Exception {
|
||||
super.setUp();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public static CapacitySchedulerConfiguration
|
||||
setupQueueConfigurationForSimpleSurgicalPreemption(
|
||||
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration conf) {
|
||||
|
||||
//set up auto created queue configs
|
||||
TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.setupQueueMappings(conf, "c",
|
||||
true, new int[] { 1, 2 });
|
||||
//setup new queues with one of them auto enabled
|
||||
// Define top-level queues
|
||||
// Set childQueue for root
|
||||
conf.setQueues(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT, new String[] { "c" });
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(C, 100f);
|
||||
|
||||
conf.setUserLimitFactor(C, 1.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreateChildQueueEnabled(C, true);
|
||||
|
||||
//Setup leaf queue template configs
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigCapacity(C, 30.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigMaxCapacity(C, 100.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimit(C, 100);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimitFactor(C, 3.0f);
|
||||
|
||||
return conf;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected CapacitySchedulerConfiguration
|
||||
setupQueueConfigurationForPriorityBasedPreemption(
|
||||
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration conf) {
|
||||
|
||||
//set up auto created queue configs
|
||||
TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.setupQueueMappings(conf, "c",
|
||||
true, new int[] { 1, 2 });
|
||||
|
||||
TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.setupQueueMappings(conf, "d",
|
||||
true, new int[] { 3, 4 });
|
||||
|
||||
TestCapacitySchedulerAutoCreatedQueueBase.setupQueueMappings(conf, "e",
|
||||
true, new int[] { 0 });
|
||||
//setup new queues with one of them auto enabled
|
||||
// Define top-level queues
|
||||
// Set childQueue for root
|
||||
conf.setQueues(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT,
|
||||
new String[] { "c", "d", "e" });
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(C, 45f);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(D, 45f);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(E, 10f);
|
||||
|
||||
conf.setUserLimitFactor(E, 3.0f);
|
||||
conf.setUserLimitFactor(C, 3.0f);
|
||||
conf.setUserLimitFactor(D, 3.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreateChildQueueEnabled(C, true);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreateChildQueueEnabled(D, true);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreateChildQueueEnabled(E, true);
|
||||
|
||||
//Setup leaf queue template configs
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigCapacity(C, 100f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigMaxCapacity(C, 100.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimit(C, 100);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimitFactor(C, 3.0f);
|
||||
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigCapacity(D, 100.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigMaxCapacity(D, 100.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimit(D, 100);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimitFactor(D, 3.0f);
|
||||
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigCapacity(E, 100.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigMaxCapacity(E, 100.0f);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimit(E, 100);
|
||||
conf.setAutoCreatedLeafQueueConfigUserLimitFactor(E, 3.0f);
|
||||
|
||||
conf.setQueuePriority(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".c", 1);
|
||||
conf.setQueuePriority(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".d", 2);
|
||||
|
||||
return conf;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test(timeout = 60000)
|
||||
public void testSimpleSurgicalPreemptionOnAutoCreatedLeafQueues()
|
||||
throws Exception {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test case: Submit two application (app1/app2) to different queues, queue
|
||||
* structure:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <pre>
|
||||
* C
|
||||
* / | \
|
||||
* USER1 USER2 USER3
|
||||
* 30 30 30
|
||||
* </pre>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1) Two nodes (n1/n2) in the cluster, each of them has 20G.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2) app1 submit to queue-USER1 first, it asked 32 * 1G containers
|
||||
* We will allocate 16 on n1 and 16 on n2.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 3) app2 submit to queue-USER2, ask for one 1G container (for AM)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 4) app2 asks for another 6G container, it will be reserved on n1
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Now: we have:
|
||||
* n1: 17 from app1, 1 from app2, and 1 reserved from app2
|
||||
* n2: 16 from app1.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* After preemption, we should expect:
|
||||
* Preempt 4 containers from app1 on n1.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
setupQueueConfigurationForSimpleSurgicalPreemption(conf);
|
||||
testSimpleSurgicalPreemption(USER1, USER2, USER1, USER2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test(timeout = 600000)
|
||||
public void
|
||||
testPreemptionFromHighestPriorityManagedParentQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
throws Exception {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test case: Submit two application (app1/app2) to different queues, queue
|
||||
* structure:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <pre>
|
||||
* Root
|
||||
* / | \
|
||||
* c d e
|
||||
* 45 45 10
|
||||
* </pre>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Priority of queue_c = 1
|
||||
* Priority of queue_d = 2
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1) 5 nodes (n0-n4) in the cluster, each of them has 4G.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2) app1 submit to queue-e first (AM=1G), it asked 4 * 1G containers
|
||||
* We will allocate 1 container on each of n0-n4. AM on n4.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 3) app2 submit to queue-c, AM container=0.5G, allocated on n0
|
||||
* Ask for 2 * 3.5G containers. (Reserved on n0/n1)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 4) app2 submit to queue-d, AM container=0.5G, allocated on n2
|
||||
* Ask for 2 * 3.5G containers. (Reserved on n2/n3)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* First we will preempt container on n2 since it is the oldest container of
|
||||
* Highest priority queue (d)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// Total preemption = 1G per round, which is 5% of cluster resource (20G)
|
||||
setupQueueConfigurationForPriorityBasedPreemption(conf);
|
||||
testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer(
|
||||
new String[] { USER1, USER3, USER0 },
|
||||
new String[] { USER1, USER3, USER0 });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.monitor.SchedulingMonitor;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.monitor.SchedulingMonitorManager;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.monitor.capacity.ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.nodelabels
|
||||
.RMNodeLabelsManager;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmapp.RMApp;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmcontainer.RMContainer;
|
||||
import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.rmnode.RMNode;
|
||||
@ -86,8 +89,19 @@ public void testSimpleSurgicalPreemption()
|
||||
* After preemption, we should expect:
|
||||
* Preempt 4 containers from app1 on n1.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MockRM rm1 = new MockRM(conf);
|
||||
rm1.getRMContext().setNodeLabelManager(mgr);
|
||||
testSimpleSurgicalPreemption("a", "c", "user", "user");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void testSimpleSurgicalPreemption(String queue1, String queue2,
|
||||
String user1, String user2)
|
||||
throws Exception {
|
||||
|
||||
MockRM rm1 = new MockRM(conf) {
|
||||
protected RMNodeLabelsManager createNodeLabelManager() {
|
||||
return mgr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
rm1.start();
|
||||
|
||||
MockNM nm1 = rm1.registerNode("h1:1234", 20 * GB);
|
||||
@ -97,7 +111,7 @@ public void testSimpleSurgicalPreemption()
|
||||
RMNode rmNode2 = rm1.getRMContext().getRMNodes().get(nm2.getNodeId());
|
||||
|
||||
// launch an app to queue, AM container should be launched in nm1
|
||||
RMApp app1 = rm1.submitApp(1 * GB, "app", "user", null, "a");
|
||||
RMApp app1 = rm1.submitApp(1 * GB, "app", user1, null, queue1);
|
||||
MockAM am1 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app1, rm1, nm1);
|
||||
|
||||
am1.allocate("*", 1 * GB, 32, new ArrayList<ContainerId>());
|
||||
@ -120,7 +134,7 @@ public void testSimpleSurgicalPreemption()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Submit app2 to queue-c and asks for a 1G container for AM
|
||||
RMApp app2 = rm1.submitApp(1 * GB, "app", "user", null, "c");
|
||||
RMApp app2 = rm1.submitApp(1 * GB, "app", user2, null, queue2);
|
||||
MockAM am2 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app2, rm1, nm1);
|
||||
|
||||
// NM1/NM2 has available resource = 2G/4G
|
||||
@ -632,6 +646,21 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
* Highest priority queue (b)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// A/B has higher priority
|
||||
conf.setQueuePriority(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".a" , 1);
|
||||
conf.setQueuePriority(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".b", 2);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".a", 45f);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".b", 45f);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".c", 10f);
|
||||
|
||||
testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer(new
|
||||
String[] {"a", "b", "c"}, new String[] {"user", "user", "user"});
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void
|
||||
testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer(String[]
|
||||
queues, String[] users) throws Exception {
|
||||
// Total preemption = 1G per round, which is 5% of cluster resource (20G)
|
||||
conf.setFloat(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.TOTAL_PREEMPTION_PER_ROUND,
|
||||
0.05f);
|
||||
@ -641,15 +670,11 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
conf.setQueueOrderingPolicy(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT,
|
||||
CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.QUEUE_PRIORITY_UTILIZATION_ORDERING_POLICY);
|
||||
|
||||
// A/B has higher priority
|
||||
conf.setQueuePriority(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".a", 1);
|
||||
conf.setQueuePriority(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".b", 2);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".a", 45f);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".b", 45f);
|
||||
conf.setCapacity(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".c", 10f);
|
||||
|
||||
MockRM rm1 = new MockRM(conf);
|
||||
rm1.getRMContext().setNodeLabelManager(mgr);
|
||||
MockRM rm1 = new MockRM(conf) {
|
||||
protected RMNodeLabelsManager createNodeLabelManager() {
|
||||
return mgr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
rm1.start();
|
||||
|
||||
MockNM[] mockNMs = new MockNM[5];
|
||||
@ -665,7 +690,7 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// launch an app to queue, AM container should be launched in nm1
|
||||
RMApp app1 = rm1.submitApp(1 * GB, "app", "user", null, "c");
|
||||
RMApp app1 = rm1.submitApp(1 * GB, "app", users[2], null, queues[2]);
|
||||
MockAM am1 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app1, rm1, mockNMs[4]);
|
||||
|
||||
am1.allocate("*", 1 * GB, 4, new ArrayList<>());
|
||||
@ -685,7 +710,7 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Submit app2 to queue-a and asks for a 0.5G container for AM (on n0)
|
||||
RMApp app2 = rm1.submitApp(512, "app", "user", null, "a");
|
||||
RMApp app2 = rm1.submitApp(512, "app", users[0], null, queues[0]);
|
||||
MockAM am2 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app2, rm1, mockNMs[0]);
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp schedulerApp2 = cs.getApplicationAttempt(
|
||||
ApplicationAttemptId.newInstance(app2.getApplicationId(), 1));
|
||||
@ -703,11 +728,11 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
Assert.assertNotNull("Should reserve on nm-" + i,
|
||||
cs.getNode(rmNodes[i].getNodeID()).getReservedContainer());
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(cs.getNode(rmNodes[i].getNodeID())
|
||||
.getReservedContainer().getQueueName(), "a");
|
||||
.getReservedContainer().getQueueName(), queues[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Submit app3 to queue-b and asks for a 0.5G container for AM (on n2)
|
||||
RMApp app3 = rm1.submitApp(512, "app", "user", null, "b");
|
||||
RMApp app3 = rm1.submitApp(512, "app", users[1], null, queues[1]);
|
||||
MockAM am3 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app3, rm1, mockNMs[2]);
|
||||
FiCaSchedulerApp schedulerApp3 = cs.getApplicationAttempt(
|
||||
ApplicationAttemptId.newInstance(app3.getApplicationId(), 1));
|
||||
@ -725,7 +750,7 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
Assert.assertNotNull("Should reserve on nm-" + i,
|
||||
cs.getNode(rmNodes[i].getNodeID()).getReservedContainer());
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals(cs.getNode(rmNodes[i].getNodeID())
|
||||
.getReservedContainer().getQueueName(), "b");
|
||||
.getReservedContainer().getQueueName(), queues[1]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sleep the timeout interval, we should be able to see 1 container selected
|
||||
@ -831,6 +856,7 @@ public void testPriorityPreemptionFromHighestPriorityQueueAndOldestContainer()
|
||||
rm1.close();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@Test(timeout = 60000)
|
||||
public void testPreemptionForFragmentatedCluster() throws Exception {
|
||||
// Set additional_balance_queue_based_on_reserved_res to true to get
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user