YARN-6081. LeafQueue#getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit should deduct reserved from pending to avoid unnecessary preemption of reserved container. Contributed by Wangda Tan.

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/monitor/capacity/TempQueuePerPartition.java

@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ public class TempQueuePerPartition extends AbstractPreemptionEntity {
   LeafQueue leafQueue;
   boolean preemptionDisabled;
 
+  protected Resource pendingDeductReserved;
+
   TempQueuePerPartition(String queueName, Resource current,
       boolean preemptionDisabled, String partition, Resource killable,
       float absCapacity, float absMaxCapacity, Resource totalPartitionResource,
@@ -61,10 +63,13 @@ public class TempQueuePerPartition extends AbstractPreemptionEntity {
     if (queue instanceof LeafQueue) {
       LeafQueue l = (LeafQueue) queue;
       pending = l.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-          totalPartitionResource, partition);
+          totalPartitionResource, partition, false);
+      pendingDeductReserved = l.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
+          totalPartitionResource, partition, true);
       leafQueue = l;
     } else {
       pending = Resources.createResource(0);
+      pendingDeductReserved = Resources.createResource(0);
     }
 
     this.normalizedGuarantee = Float.NaN;
@@ -95,16 +100,13 @@ public void addChild(TempQueuePerPartition q) {
     assert leafQueue == null;
     children.add(q);
     Resources.addTo(pending, q.pending);
+    Resources.addTo(pendingDeductReserved, q.pendingDeductReserved);
   }
 
   public ArrayList<TempQueuePerPartition> getChildren() {
     return children;
   }
 
-  public Resource getUsedDeductReservd() {
-    return Resources.subtract(current, reserved);
-  }
-
   // This function "accepts" all the resources it can (pending) and return
   // the unused ones
   Resource offer(Resource avail, ResourceCalculator rc,
@@ -121,7 +123,8 @@ Resource offer(Resource avail, ResourceCalculator rc,
              * When we're using FifoPreemptionSelector (considerReservedResource
              * = false).
              *
-             * We should deduct reserved resource to avoid excessive preemption:
+             * We should deduct reserved resource from pending to avoid excessive
+             * preemption:
              *
              * For example, if an under-utilized queue has used = reserved = 20.
              * Preemption policy will try to preempt 20 containers (which is not
@@ -131,10 +134,8 @@ Resource offer(Resource avail, ResourceCalculator rc,
              * resource can be used by pending request, so policy will preempt
              * resources repeatly.
              */
-            .subtract(
-                Resources.add((considersReservedResource
-                    ? getUsed()
-                    : getUsedDeductReservd()), pending),
+            .subtract(Resources.add(getUsed(),
+                (considersReservedResource ? pending : pendingDeductReserved)),
                 idealAssigned)));
     Resource remain = Resources.subtract(avail, accepted);
     Resources.addTo(idealAssigned, accepted);

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/SchedulerApplicationAttempt.java

@@ -1209,6 +1209,14 @@ public boolean hasPendingResourceRequest(ResourceCalculator rc,
     return false;
   }
 
+  /*
+   * Note that the behavior of appAttemptResourceUsage is different from queue's
+   * For queue, used = actual-used + reserved
+   * For app, used = actual-used.
+   *
+   * TODO (wangda): Need to make behaviors of queue/app's resource usage
+   * consistent
+   */
   @VisibleForTesting
   public ResourceUsage getAppAttemptResourceUsage() {
     return this.attemptResourceUsage;

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/capacity/LeafQueue.java

@@ -2155,38 +2155,64 @@ public Collection<FiCaSchedulerApp> getAllApplications() {
     return Collections.unmodifiableCollection(apps);
   }
 
-  // Consider the headroom for each user in the queue.
-  // Total pending for the queue =
-  //   sum(for each user(min((user's headroom), sum(user's pending requests))))
-  //  NOTE: Used for calculating pedning resources in the preemption monitor.
+  /**
+   * Get total pending resource considering user limit for the leaf queue. This
+   * will be used for calculating pending resources in the preemption monitor.
+   *
+   * Consider the headroom for each user in the queue.
+   * Total pending for the queue =
+   * sum(for each user(min((user's headroom), sum(user's pending requests))))
+   * NOTE:
+
+   * @param clusterResources clusterResource
+   * @param partition node partition
+   * @param deductReservedFromPending When a container is reserved in CS,
+   *                                  pending resource will not be deducted.
+   *                                  This could lead to double accounting when
+   *                                  doing preemption:
+   *                                  In normal cases, we should deduct reserved
+   *                                  resource from pending to avoid
+   *                                  excessive preemption.
+   * @return Total pending resource considering user limit
+   */
+
   public Resource getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-          Resource resources, String partition) {
+      Resource clusterResources, String partition, boolean deductReservedFromPending) {
     try {
       readLock.lock();
       Map<String, Resource> userNameToHeadroom =
           new HashMap<>();
-      Resource pendingConsideringUserLimit = Resource.newInstance(0, 0);
+      Resource totalPendingConsideringUserLimit = Resource.newInstance(0, 0);
       for (FiCaSchedulerApp app : getApplications()) {
         String userName = app.getUser();
         if (!userNameToHeadroom.containsKey(userName)) {
           User user = getUser(userName);
           Resource headroom = Resources.subtract(
-              computeUserLimit(app.getUser(), resources, user, partition,
+              computeUserLimit(app.getUser(), clusterResources, user, partition,
                   SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY),
               user.getUsed(partition));
           // Make sure headroom is not negative.
           headroom = Resources.componentwiseMax(headroom, Resources.none());
           userNameToHeadroom.put(userName, headroom);
         }
+
+        // Check if we need to deduct reserved from pending
+        Resource pending = app.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getPending(
+            partition);
+        if (deductReservedFromPending) {
+          pending = Resources.subtract(pending,
+              app.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getReserved(partition));
+        }
+        pending = Resources.componentwiseMax(pending, Resources.none());
+
         Resource minpendingConsideringUserLimit = Resources.componentwiseMin(
-            userNameToHeadroom.get(userName),
-            app.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getPending(partition));
-        Resources.addTo(pendingConsideringUserLimit,
+            userNameToHeadroom.get(userName), pending);
+        Resources.addTo(totalPendingConsideringUserLimit,
             minpendingConsideringUserLimit);
         Resources.subtractFrom(userNameToHeadroom.get(userName),
             minpendingConsideringUserLimit);
       }
-      return pendingConsideringUserLimit;
+      return totalPendingConsideringUserLimit;
     } finally {
       readLock.unlock();
     }

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/monitor/capacity/ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicyMockFramework.java

@@ -599,19 +599,21 @@ private void setupQueue(CSQueue queue, String q, String[] queueExprArray,
       qc.setUsedCapacity(partitionName, used);
       when(queue.getUsedCapacity()).thenReturn(used);
       ru.setPending(partitionName, pending);
-      if (!isParent(queueExprArray, idx)) {
-        LeafQueue lq = (LeafQueue) queue;
-        when(lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(isA(Resource.class),
-            isA(String.class))).thenReturn(pending);
-      }
-      ru.setUsed(partitionName, parseResourceFromString(values[2].trim()));
-
       // Setup reserved resource if it contained by input config
       Resource reserved = Resources.none();
       if(values.length == 5) {
         reserved = parseResourceFromString(values[4].trim());
         ru.setReserved(partitionName, reserved);
       }
+      if (!isParent(queueExprArray, idx)) {
+        LeafQueue lq = (LeafQueue) queue;
+        when(lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(isA(Resource.class),
+            isA(String.class), eq(false))).thenReturn(pending);
+        when(lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(isA(Resource.class),
+            isA(String.class), eq(true))).thenReturn(
+            Resources.subtract(pending, reserved));
+      }
+      ru.setUsed(partitionName, parseResourceFromString(values[2].trim()));
 
       LOG.debug("Setup queue=" + queueName + " partition=" + partitionName
           + " [abs_guaranteed=" + absGuaranteed + ",abs_max=" + absMax

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/monitor/capacity/TestProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy.java

@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
 import static org.mockito.Matchers.any;
 import static org.mockito.Matchers.anyString;
 import static org.mockito.Matchers.argThat;
+import static org.mockito.Matchers.eq;
 import static org.mockito.Matchers.isA;
 import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
 import static org.mockito.Mockito.never;
@@ -989,7 +990,7 @@ public void testHierarchicalLarge3LevelsWithReserved() {
     ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy policy = buildPolicy(qData);
     policy.editSchedule();
 
-    verify(mDisp, times(10)).handle(argThat(new IsPreemptionRequestFor(appC)));
+    verify(mDisp, times(9)).handle(argThat(new IsPreemptionRequestFor(appC)));
     assertEquals(10, policy.getQueuePartitions().get("queueE")
         .get("").preemptableExtra.getMemorySize());
     //2nd level child(E) preempts 10, but parent A has only 9 extra
@@ -1004,6 +1005,31 @@ public void testHierarchicalLarge3LevelsWithReserved() {
         tempQueueAPartition.preemptableExtra.getMemorySize());
   }
 
+  @Test
+  public void testPreemptionNotHappenForSingleReservedQueue() {
+    /*
+     * Test case to make sure, when reserved > pending, preemption will not
+     * happen if there's only one demanding queue.
+     */
+
+    int[][] qData = new int[][]{
+        //  /   A   B   C
+        { 100, 40, 40, 20 },  // abs
+        { 100, 100, 100, 100 },  // maxCap
+        { 100,  70,  0,  0 },  // used
+        {  10, 30,  0,  0 },  // pending
+        {   0,  50,  0,  0 },  // reserved
+        {   1,  1,  0,  0 },  // apps
+        {  -1,  1,  1,  1 },  // req granularity
+        {   3,  0,  0,  0 },  // subqueues
+    };
+    ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy policy = buildPolicy(qData);
+    policy.editSchedule();
+
+    // No preemption happens
+    verify(mDisp, never()).handle(argThat(new IsPreemptionRequestFor(appA)));
+  }
+
   static class IsPreemptionRequestFor
       extends ArgumentMatcher<ContainerPreemptEvent> {
     private final ApplicationAttemptId appAttId;
@@ -1224,7 +1250,14 @@ LeafQueue mockLeafQueue(ParentQueue p, Resource tot, int i, Resource[] abs,
     List<ApplicationAttemptId> appAttemptIdList = 
         new ArrayList<ApplicationAttemptId>();
     when(lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(isA(Resource.class),
-        isA(String.class))).thenReturn(pending[i]);
+        isA(String.class), eq(false))).thenReturn(pending[i]);
+
+    when(lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(isA(Resource.class),
+        isA(String.class), eq(true))).thenReturn(Resources.componentwiseMax(
+        Resources.subtract(pending[i],
+            reserved[i] == null ? Resources.none() : reserved[i]),
+        Resources.none()));
+
     // need to set pending resource in resource usage as well
     ResourceUsage ru = new ResourceUsage();
     ru.setPending(pending[i]);
@@ -1360,27 +1393,4 @@ static Resource leafAbsCapacities(Resource[] abs, int[] subqueues) {
     return ret;
   }
 
-  void printString(CSQueue nq, String indent) {
-    if (nq instanceof ParentQueue) {
-      System.out.println(indent + nq.getQueueName()
-          + " cur:" + nq.getAbsoluteUsedCapacity()
-          + " guar:" + nq.getAbsoluteCapacity()
-          );
-      for (CSQueue q : ((ParentQueue)nq).getChildQueues()) {
-        printString(q, indent + "  ");
-      }
-    } else {
-      System.out.println(indent + nq.getQueueName()
-          + " pen:"
-              + ((LeafQueue) nq).getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-                                        isA(Resource.class), isA(String.class))
-          + " cur:" + nq.getAbsoluteUsedCapacity()
-          + " guar:" + nq.getAbsoluteCapacity()
-          );
-      for (FiCaSchedulerApp a : ((LeafQueue)nq).getApplications()) {
-        System.out.println(indent + "  " + a.getApplicationId());
-      }
-    }
-  }
-
 }

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/capacity/TestContainerAllocation.java

@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
 import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.event.NodeUpdateSchedulerEvent;
 import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.security.RMContainerTokenSecretManager;
 import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.utils.BuilderUtils;
+import org.apache.hadoop.yarn.util.resource.Resources;
 import org.junit.Assert;
 import org.junit.Before;
 import org.junit.Test;
@@ -691,4 +692,88 @@ public void testContinuousReservationLookingWhenUsedEqualsMax() throws Exception
 
     rm1.close();
   }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit() throws Exception {
+    // Set maximum capacity of A to 10
+    CapacitySchedulerConfiguration newConf = new CapacitySchedulerConfiguration(
+        conf);
+    newConf.setUserLimitFactor(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".default",
+        0.5f);
+    newConf.setMaximumAMResourcePercentPerPartition(
+        CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".default", "", 1.0f);
+    MockRM rm1 = new MockRM(newConf);
+
+    rm1.getRMContext().setNodeLabelManager(mgr);
+    rm1.start();
+    MockNM nm1 = rm1.registerNode("h1:1234", 8 * GB);
+    MockNM nm2 = rm1.registerNode("h2:1234", 8 * GB);
+
+    // launch an app to queue default, AM container should be launched in nm1
+    RMApp app1 = rm1.submitApp(2 * GB, "app", "u1", null, "default");
+    MockAM am1 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app1, rm1, nm1);
+
+    // launch 2nd app to queue default, AM container should be launched in nm1
+    RMApp app2 = rm1.submitApp(4 * GB, "app", "u2", null, "default");
+    MockAM am2 = MockRM.launchAndRegisterAM(app2, rm1, nm1);
+
+    // am1 asks 1 * 3G container
+    am1.allocate("*", 3 * GB, 1, null);
+
+    // am2 asks 4 * 5G container
+    am2.allocate("*", 5 * GB, 4, null);
+
+    CapacityScheduler cs = (CapacityScheduler) rm1.getResourceScheduler();
+    RMNode rmNode1 = rm1.getRMContext().getRMNodes().get(nm1.getNodeId());
+    RMNode rmNode2 = rm1.getRMContext().getRMNodes().get(nm2.getNodeId());
+
+    // Do node heartbeats one, we expect one container allocated reserved on nm1
+    cs.handle(new NodeUpdateSchedulerEvent(rmNode1));
+
+    FiCaSchedulerApp schedulerApp1 =
+        cs.getApplicationAttempt(am1.getApplicationAttemptId());
+
+    // App1 will get 1 container reserved
+    Assert.assertEquals(1, schedulerApp1.getReservedContainers().size());
+
+    /*
+     * Note that the behavior of appAttemptResourceUsage is different from queue's
+     * For queue, used = actual-used + reserved
+     * For app, used = actual-used.
+     *
+     * TODO (wangda): Need to make behaviors of queue/app's resource usage
+     * consistent
+     */
+    Assert.assertEquals(2 * GB,
+        schedulerApp1.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getUsed().getMemorySize());
+    Assert.assertEquals(3 * GB,
+        schedulerApp1.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getReserved()
+            .getMemorySize());
+    Assert.assertEquals(3 * GB,
+        schedulerApp1.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getPending()
+            .getMemorySize());
+
+    FiCaSchedulerApp schedulerApp2 =
+        cs.getApplicationAttempt(am2.getApplicationAttemptId());
+    Assert.assertEquals(4 * GB,
+        schedulerApp2.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getUsed().getMemorySize());
+    Assert.assertEquals(0 * GB,
+        schedulerApp2.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getReserved()
+            .getMemorySize());
+    Assert.assertEquals(5 * 4 * GB,
+        schedulerApp2.getAppAttemptResourceUsage().getPending()
+            .getMemorySize());
+
+    LeafQueue lq = (LeafQueue) cs.getQueue("default");
+
+    // UL = 8GB, so head room of u1 = 8GB - 2GB (AM) - 3GB (Reserved) = 3GB
+    //                           u2 = 8GB - 4GB = 4GB
+    // When not deduct reserved, total-pending = 3G (u1) + 4G (u2) = 7G
+    //          deduct reserved, total-pending = 0G (u1) + 4G = 4G
+    Assert.assertEquals(7 * GB, lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
+        Resources.createResource(20 * GB), "", false).getMemorySize());
+    Assert.assertEquals(4 * GB, lq.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
+        Resources.createResource(20 * GB), "", true).getMemorySize());
+    rm1.close();
+  }
 }

hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/scheduler/capacity/TestLeafQueue.java

@@ -3283,8 +3283,9 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitOneUser()
     // even though user_0's apps are still asking for a total of 4GB.
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
-    assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-                   clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+    assertEquals(0 * GB,
+        e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(clusterResource,
+            RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
 
     // Assign 2nd container of 1GB
     applyCSAssignment(clusterResource,
@@ -3298,7 +3299,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitOneUser()
     assertEquals(2*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
 
     // Can't allocate 3rd container due to user-limit. Headroom still 0.
     applyCSAssignment(clusterResource,
@@ -3308,7 +3309,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitOneUser()
     assertEquals(2*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
 
     // Increase user-limit-factor from 1GB to 10GB (1% * 10 * 100GB = 10GB).
     // Pending for both app_0 and app_1 are still 3GB, so user-limit-factor
@@ -3316,7 +3317,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitOneUser()
     // getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit()
     e.setUserLimitFactor(10.0f);
     assertEquals(3*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
 
     applyCSAssignment(clusterResource,
         e.assignContainers(clusterResource, node_0,
@@ -3326,7 +3327,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitOneUser()
     assertEquals(3*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(2*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
 
     // Get the last 2 containers for app_1, no more pending requests.
     applyCSAssignment(clusterResource,
@@ -3340,7 +3341,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitOneUser()
     assertEquals(3*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(2*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
 
     // Release each container from app_0
     for (RMContainer rmContainer : app_0.getLiveContainers()) {
@@ -3449,7 +3450,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
     // With queue capacity set at 1% of 100GB and user-limit-factor set to 1.0,
     // queue 'e' should be able to consume 1GB per user.
     assertEquals(2*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // None of the apps have assigned resources
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(0*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
@@ -3466,7 +3467,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
    // The first container was assigned to user_0's app_0. Queues total headroom
     // has 1GB left for user_1.
     assertEquals(1*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(0*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
@@ -3484,7 +3485,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
     // this container went to user_0's app_1. so, headroom for queue 'e'e is
     // still 1GB for user_1
     assertEquals(1*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
@@ -3500,7 +3501,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
     // Container was allocated to user_1's app_2 since user_1, Now, no headroom
     // is left.
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
@@ -3516,7 +3517,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
     // Allocated to user_1's app_2 since scheduler allocates 1 container
     // above user resource limit. Available headroom still 0.
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // user_0's apps:
     long app_0_consumption = app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize();
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0_consumption);
@@ -3536,7 +3537,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
     // Cannot allocate 5th container because both users are above their allowed
     // user resource limit. Values should be the same as previously.
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(app_0_consumption, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(app_1_consumption, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
@@ -3555,7 +3556,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
         SchedulingMode.RESPECT_PARTITION_EXCLUSIVITY), e, nodes, apps);
     // Next container goes to user_0's app_1, since it still wanted 1GB.
     assertEquals(1*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(2*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
@@ -3570,7 +3571,7 @@ public void testGetTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimitTwoUsers()
     // Last container goes to user_1's app_3, since it still wanted 1GB.
     // user_0's apps:
     assertEquals(0*GB, e.getTotalPendingResourcesConsideringUserLimit(
-        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL).getMemorySize());
+        clusterResource, RMNodeLabelsManager.NO_LABEL, false).getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(1*GB, app_0.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     assertEquals(2*GB, app_1.getCurrentConsumption().getMemorySize());
     // user_1's apps: